Beyond the Hype: How MCP and Agents Quietly Rewire System Design - Posts

AI AGENT

Beyond the Hype: How MCP and Agents Quietly Rewire System Design

MCP did not reinvent the wheel; It just gave it an axle that scales.

The new buzz isn't really new. Every few years, tech gets a fresh coat of paint and a bold new label. Remember when everything was "cloud-native"? Or when every startup was "Uber for X"? Now it is "AI agents" and "MCP."

Sometimes the rebranding actually matters.

But if you step back, take a breath, and squint a little, it’s clear: we are not witnessing a revolution. We are watching an overdue refinement. What we call AI agents now are really just well-structured tools, built on ideas we've had for decades. They are just well-structured tools that finally learned how to talk to each other without breaking.

That is where MCP comes in, a genuine step forward that standardizes interactions without promising magic. MCP is the protocol that makes this work reliably, not magically.

MCP and AI agents ARE the future. The question is not whether to adopt them. It is how to implement them without creating expensive, fragile messes.

The technology is solid. The implementation strategy? That is where most of the effort and thought process should be invested in.

Wheel as the symbolic representation of how a history of innovation that will roll on into the future.
(U.S. Army graphic by Dale Cordes)

AI Agent: A Tool That Knows When to Act

Imagine a carpenter’s toolbox. A hammer doesn’t know when to hit a nail; the carpenter does. But what if your entire workshop could coordinate a job from start to finish, with each tool knowing when to step in and when to step back?

That is what an AI Agent is. It is a tool, with a bit of self-awareness and communication built in. Not because it is conscious. But because we have wrapped it with structure, memory, and interfaces.

Agents are NOT magical. They are predictable workflows wrapped in reusable modules.

If you build systems as a developer, this is liberating. No more manually wiring a brittle workflow of scripts and APIs. You design a chain of roles: planner, researcher, writer, tester, and let the system route tasks and data. You get modularity with memory.

If you design interfaces and prototype as a designer, it feels like working in Figma with plugins that coordinate instead of acting alone. One plugin drafts the layout. Another picks the right image. Another checks contrast. Suddenly, your tools behave like a team.

If you run a business, this feels like hiring freelancers who show up already briefed. They don't just ask, “What do I do?” They say, “Got it. Here’s what’s next.”

An image generated by Mariya Mansurova using DALL-E 3

Model Context Protocol (MCP): Tools with coordination, not cognition.

The missing piece was not better intelligence. It was better orchestration.

Before MCP, agents (or LLMs, or scripts) used to operate blindly. Building AI workflows used to be:

Custom integrations everywhere
Context getting lost between steps
Systems that worked in demos but broke in production
Debugging chains of AI calls that developer might not know why it work the way it was

Now you get plug-and-play intelligence via MCP. Now, each agent has:

A defined role.
Access to shared memory.
The ability to pass context downstream.

This means you can build chains of reasoning, handovers that feel human, and systems that scale without manually managing every state. Context should not be passed like a baton - it is more like a working memory buffer, shared and updated with transaction discipline. What is revolutionary is not that agents can talk - it is that now, we have rules about how they remember.

MCP is "boring" in the best possible way. It is a standard that says: "Here is how agents talk to tools, tools talk to data, and everyone plays nice together". Its strengths include:

A universal interface eliminating the need for custom integrations
Real-time, two-way communication enabling dynamic workflows
Improved reliability ensuring predictable results
Enhanced context management giving agents access to the right information
An open ecosystem encouraging collaboration and innovation

Commonly used MCP illustration by Norah Klintberg Sakal

Why It Feels Like Magic, But Isn’t

Here’s the thing: this feels new because it works better. You can assemble intelligent systems like Lego blocks and they actually snap together properly.

But do not confuse functionality with consciousness. These agents do not understand. They pattern-match well, remember enough and act predictably. And that is all you need. What is truly powerful is the architecture.

A startup with a clear workflow can outmaneuver legacy giants trying to bolt AI onto broken systems. A solo developer can launch a multi-step assistant without managing five queues and three databases. A designer can build adaptive experiences that respond to intent, not just clicks.

Think about it, we have been here before. This is not our first evolution in system design.

Microservices were not revolutionary. They just gave us cleaner ways to organize monolithic messes.
APIs did not just change programming. They just opened up access with consistent rules.
Cloud computing did not invent distributed systems. It just made them rentable by the hour.
AI agents + MCP follow the same pattern. Not new intelligence - just better protocols for coordination and scale.

Each step was not about intelligence. It was about structure, coordination, and composability. Agents and MCP are simply the next step. They might be the better kind of machinery, wrapped in human-like workflows. Same engine. Smarter transmission.

The real opportunity is not intelligence. It is intentionality.

Instead of chasing “smarter agents,” the opportunity is in designing clearer systems and build with intention:

Define what each agent does and does not know (roles, memory boundaries, and goals).
Architect the handoff points where memory moves and decisions get made.
Treat agents like teammates in a relay, not magicians with all the answers.

This mindset changes everything.

Instead of slapping AI onto your product, you rethink your workflows. You stop designing monoliths and start composing modular behaviors. You stop hoping the model will guess right and instead build a system where it is hard to guess wrong. And you start to notice: the best agents are not the ones with the biggest models. They are the ones placed in the right spot, with just enough context, doing one thing well.

What Could Go Wrong (Spoiler: Lots of Things)

We are still in the honeymoon phase. AI agents powered by MCP are performing surprisingly well - orchestrated, efficient, even delightful. But cracks are already forming beneath the surface. We should be honest about them.

The Context Black Hole: Agents assume they can access the "right" information at the right time. Reality is messier:

Context windows hit token limits
Shared memory gets corrupted without proper versioning
Agents confidently act on outdated or incomplete information

The Infinity Loop of Doom: Poorly designed agent teams create infinite loops:

The Planner asks Researcher for market data
Researcher returns generic insights
Planner asks for "more specific" data
Researcher tries harder, returns slightly different generic insights
Loop continues until token limit or timeout

Framework Fatigue Incoming: MCP risks becoming the new "everyone should use microservices". If everyone applies the same template without critical design thinking, we will drown in:

Generic agents
Redundant chains
Shallow integrations

The framework and principles were designed to cover the broadest range of generic use cases. However, in our experience, certain edge cases still require an extra touch of our own to fully connect the dots.

Illustration from a thought provoking article by Victor Dibia, emphasizing on how MCP is still at its early stage.

How this affect us: XTOPIA

Let's get concrete.

Few years ago, we built XTOPIA, our proprietary content management system, that has been the key powerhouse to our clients across industries, empowering them to transform their digital transformation journey. But let's be honest, these are some of the known flaws

Replicating content and press releases on similar pages from time to time, manually
Copy-paste content onto pages when there is more than 100 pages of information need to be published at the same time
Manually check for style consistency because there is no automated enforcement
Pray that bulk updates do not break something important

With MCP and Agentic framework plugged into XTOPIA, you potentially gets:

You update one product’s pricing, and the system gently asks:
“Hey, want me to sync this across the other 42 pages?”
You hit publish, and instead of double-checking fonts and paddings, you got a message like:
“You’ve got a weird looking button here - want me to fix it?”
Your company needs 100 new products live on your website by tomorrow morning. Instead of pulling an all-nighter, you got a notification:
“I’ve crawled your product matrix, ready to preload your AI Assistant so it’s fully briefed by morning?”

You are still using XTOPIA.
But it feels like XTOPIA knows you now.

No interface redesign. No AI showboating.
Just your tools; a little sharper, a little smarter, a lot more helpful.

Stay tuned, this is just the start.

The Takeaway

AI agents are not our successors. They are just better tools shaped like teammates, built like systems, and powered by structure, not spark.

MCP did not invent a new world. It just gave us a way to finally wire the old one to work at scale.

This is not a revolution. It is a shift: practical, grounded, and quietly powerful. But it still demands thoughtful design.

It is not the final form of system design. Just a clearer map of the path we have always been trying to walk.

Share this page

This article is brought to you by XIMNET — the leading Agentic AI solutions provider and creator of AI platforms like XTOPIA.IO.

IDEAS FOR AI AGENT SYSTEMS

Ideas that ignite